Summary of Formalist Schools of Thought and Their Impact on Administrative Decisions

Abstract

This research addresses formalist schools of thought in legal philosophy and public administration, with a focus on their impact on administrative decisions. Formalist doctrines are based on the idea that the validity and legality of an administrative decision depend on compliance with the rules and procedures established by law, such as jurisdiction, form, cause, and the procedures preceding the issuance of the decision. The research shows that formalist doctrines have a positive impact on administrative decisions, as they contribute to achieving the principle of legality, ensuring equality among individuals, protecting their rights from administrative arbitrariness, and helping to organize administrative work while providing stability and clarity in decisions. On the other hand, excessive adherence to formalities may lead to administrative delay and hinder the public interest if procedures become an end in themselves rather than a means of achieving justice and efficiency. The research concludes that formalist doctrines have played an essential role in establishing control over administration and ensuring respect for the law. However, contemporary practice tends toward balancing compliance with legal formalities and achieving administrative effectiveness, so that procedures serve the public interest rather than obstruct it.